Main Article Content

Abstract

This review article examines the complex relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and the domains of religion and social studies, presenting a comprehensive analysis of AI's influence on these fields. It explores how AI technologies are being integrated into religious practices, facilitating new ways of worship and interpretation of sacred texts, while also offering novel approaches to understanding social dynamics and cultural phenomena. The discussion extends to the ethical implications of AI in these contexts, including concerns about privacy, autonomy, and the authenticity of AI-mediated experiences. By highlighting the potential for AI to both reflect and shape societal norms and values, the article advocates for interdisciplinary collaboration and the development of ethical frameworks to ensure that advancements in AI contribute positively to human dignity and societal progress. This article encapsulates the main themes and concerns addressed in the article, underscoring the importance of a balanced approach to the integration of AI into religious and social spheres.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Religion Social Studies Technological Advancement

Article Details

How to Cite
Johannes Yao , D. W. . (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Shaping Religion and Social Studies. Convergence Chronicles, 5(1), 334–342. https://doi.org/10.53075/Ijmsirq/57556756464

References

  1. Clarke, R. (2019a). Principles and business processes for responsible AI. Computer Law and Security Review, 35(4), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.04.007
  2. Clarke, R. (2019b). Regulatory alternatives for AI. Computer Law and Security Review, 35(4), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.04.008
  3. Corsaro, D., Vargo, S. L., Hofacker, C., & Massara, F. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the shaping of the business context. Journal of Business Research, 145, 210–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.072
  4. Govindan, K. (2023). Unlocking the potential of quality as a core marketing strategy in remanufactured circular products: A machine learning enabled multi-theoretical perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 109123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109123
  5. Herrmann, H. (2023). What’s next for responsible artificial intelligence: a way forward through responsible innovation. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14379
  6. Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
  7. Kleizen, B., Van Dooren, W., Verhoest, K., & Tan, E. (2023). Do citizens trust trustworthy artificial intelligence? Experimental evidence on the limits of ethical AI measures in government. Government Information Quarterly, 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101834
  8. Kowalczuk, P., Siepmann (née Scheiben), C., & Adler, J. (2021). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral consumer responses to augmented reality in e-commerce: A comparative study. Journal of Business Research, 124, 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.050
  9. Lamotte, M. De. (2020). Enlightenment, Artificial Intelligence and Society. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53(2), 17427–17432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2110
  10. Mingers, J., & Walsham, G. (2010). Toward ethical information systems: The contribution of discourse ethics. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 34(4), 855–870. https://doi.org/10.2307/25750707
  11. Mustak, M., Salminen, J., Plé, L., & Wirtz, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence in marketing: Topic modeling, scientometric analysis, and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 124, 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.044
  12. Pizzi, G., Scarpi, D., & Pantano, E. (2021). Artificial intelligence and the new forms of interaction: Who has the control when interacting with a chatbot? Journal of Business Research, 129, 878–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.006
  13. Rehg, W. (2015). Discourse ethics for computer ethics: a heuristic for engaged dialogical reflection. Ethics and Information Technology, 17(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10676-014-9359-0
  14. Rodrigues, R. (2020). Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities. Journal of Responsible Technology, 4, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2020.100005
  15. Ryan, M., & Stahl, B. C. (2021). Artificial intelligence ethics guidelines for developers and users: clarifying their content and normative implications. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 19(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-12-2019-0138
  16. Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2012). Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10676-010-9234-6
  17. Stahl, B. C. (2012). Morality, ethics, and reflection: A categorization of normative IS research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(8), 636–656. https://doi.org/10.17705/1JAIS.00304
  18. Stahl, B. C., Brooks, L., Hatzakis, T., Santiago, N., & Wright, D. (2023). Exploring ethics and human rights in artificial intelligence – A Delphi study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122502
  19. Stahl, B. C., & Wright, D. (2018). Ethics and Privacy in AI and Big Data: Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation. IEEE Security and Privacy, 16(3), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.2701164
  20. Sürücü, L., Ertan, Ş. S., Bağlarbaşı, E., & Maslakçı, A. (2021). COVID-19 and human flourishing: The moderating role of gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111111
  21. Tavani, H. T. (2009). Informational Privacy: Concepts, Theories, and Controversies. The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, 131–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470281819.CH6
  22. Varley-Winter, O., & Shah, H. (2016). The opportunities and ethics of big data: Practical priorities for a national council of data ethics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374(2083). https://doi.org/10.1098/RSTA.2016.0116
  23. Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1057/EJIS.1995.9
  24. Wright, D. (2011). A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(3), 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10676-010-9242-6
  25. Wright, D., Stahl, B., & Hatzakis, T. (2020). Policy scenarios as an instrument for policymakers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119972
  26. Zhang, T., Lu, X., Zhu, X., & Zhang, J. (2023). The contributions of AI in the development of ideological and political perspectives in education. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13403
  27. Zirar, A., Ali, S. I., & Islam, N. (2023). Worker and workplace Artificial Intelligence (AI) coexistence: Emerging themes and research agenda. Technovation, 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102747